Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case regulation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. As an example, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
In that sense, case legislation differs from a person jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in The big apple would not be decided using case regulation from California. Rather, Ny courts will assess the issue counting on binding precedent . If no previous decisions about the issue exist, The big apple courts may have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority rather than binding authority. Other factors including how outdated the decision is as well as the closeness towards the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common regulation.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and efficiently.
The law as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
ten. Without touching the merits from the case of your issue of annual increases inside the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to become made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, and also the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Any court might request to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really comprehensive, but this check here is an excellent starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.